6 Comments
Apr 27, 2022Liked by Gavin Giovannoni

If it doesn’t measure the smouldering disease, why would we want it to be approved? Since the majority of disability isn’t predicted by lesions and relapses (inflammatory disease) this sounds like it would not at all be similar to c-reactive protein in RA. Neurologists are already too focused on radiologic activity, it would be terrible if we now enter an era where neurologists start insisting a patient’s MS is under control just because the sNfL curve is flat…

Expand full comment
author

Sadly the majority of disability is not predicted by relapse and MRI activity. If it was we wouldn't have people who are NEIDA developing progressive MS. In fact very little of disability is predicted by relapses and MRI activity, which is why they are not the disease.

Expand full comment

I have been asking myself whether, when/if the assay works its way through the various Circumlocution Offices to a NICE thumbs-up, whether it may displace or spell the end of the increasingly blunt-looking tool of the annual MRI?

Expand full comment

... which would presumably free up a useful chunk of change the NHS might then be able to spend on, say, wider autologous stem cell treatments?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

CRP is not a good MS biomarker. I refer to CRP being used in rheumatoid arthritis. The MS biomarker is NFL.

Expand full comment

I thought I read that, thanks for your reply :)

Expand full comment